Public Values

Pitfalls for professionals in public-private partnerships

Becoming "partners" in business ventures with government can bring unwelcome, untenable risks.

Author Brian Watkinson - CUTC.Caby Brian Watkinson, Canadian Architect

April, 2008

The Relatively Recent and Hotly Debated Procurement Model of Public-Private Partnerships Brings Both Opportunities and Risks

Governments at all levels in Canada are using public-private partnerships (P3) to procure and deliver public buildings. On the face of it, this major investment translates into opportunities for our profession. However, architects need to understand that P3s result in startlingly different business and working relationships which bring with them new roles, responsibilities, challenges and risks.

Why are Governments Using P3s?

When first venturing into P3s, governments cited our massive "infrastructure deficit" in Canada — now estimated at well over $130 billion — the reason for seeking innovative financing schemes from the private sector, claiming that they couldn't afford to address the issue alone. P3 proponents went on to proclaim that public buildings can benefit from the efficiencies resulting from the private sector's ability to work smarter, faster and cheaper than the public sector. Today, it is "risk sharing" that is most frequently offered as the reason for using P3s. Public owners maintain that under traditional project delivery models, they are unfairly saddled with responsibility for risky cost overruns, delays, and substandard quality in design and construction.

As a result of this economic and political climate, governments are creating complex P3 contracts that transfer these kinds of risks — and more — to private-sector "partners" with the expectation that they are better positioned to manage those risks, often by transferring as many of these risks as they can on to other partners, including architects. With P3s, it is this transfer of risk that leads to some of the greatest challenges for our profession. . .

Brian Watkinson is an industry professional who has been researching P3s and studying their implementation since they were first introduced to Canada.

Links and sources
  P3 For You and Me?, by Brian Watkinson, Canadian Architect, April 2008 edition

Posted: May 28, 2008

  Public services
  Front lines
  Voices of privatization
  Feedback and dialogue

Public Values ( is a project of the Golden Lake Institute and the online publication

Public Values
Donate to
Health care
Public services
Natural resources
Front lines
Voices of privatization
Feedback and dialogue
About Us
What is framing?
Wednesday, December 13, 2017
Updated frequently
To view photo captions, run your mouse over the photo
Bookmark and Share

© Golden Lake Institute/, 2007-11 owns copyright on all staff-written articles.
We encourage others to freely distribute material from this website but, without explicit permission,
Web publishers may only use short excerpts that also include credit to us and a reference to our site for the full article.
This site is managed by the Golden Lake InstituteVisit Golden Lake Institute Website and Straight Goods NewsVisit Straight Goods News Website
For comments or suggestions, please contact the Editor
For technical issues, please contact the Webmaster