Public Values

Tar sands tanker traffic could cause another Exxon Valdez disaster

Twenty one years after mega-spill Harper government is moving to return giant tankers to the BC coastline.

Oil pours into Prince William Sound after Exxon Valdez accident in 1989.OTTAWA, March 24, 2010, Straight Goods News, with YouTube video: On March 24, 1989 at 12:04 am the Exxon Valdez oil tanker ran aground on Bligh Reef causing one of the most devastating environmental disasters in North American history. Now, 21 years later, the Conservative government is pushing to start having oil tankers off the sensitive coast of British Columbia.

On the anniversary of the accident, NDP MP Fin Donnelly(New Westminster-Coquitlam and Port Moody) announced the introduction of a private member's bill seeking to outlaw all oil tankers in the Dixon Entrance, Hecate Strait and Queen Charlotte Sound.

"My bill would make the moratorium on oil tanker traffic in this region legally binding," said Donnelly. "The moratorium on oil tanker traffic has been in place for over 35 years - it was necessary to protect our coastline then - it's still necessary now".

Video clips from a Parliament Hill news conference with NDP MPs Nathan Cullen, Linda Robertson, and Fin Donnelly

Yesterday, First Nations groups and community activists from all over British Columbia came together to denounce the proposed Enbridge Pipeline which would bring 225 oil tankers a year through the Hecate Strait and the Queen Charlotte Sound to move oil to markets in Asia and the US.

"People from across northern British Columbia are uniting against this pipeline and the oil tanker traffic it will create," said Nathan Cullen, New Democrat Natural Resources Critic and MP for the northern BC riding of Skeena-Bulkley Valley. "The decisions are being made in Ottawa, but the First Nations and the local grassroots are saying that their future isn't in the temporary jobs this would create. They are looking for real investments in new green energy."

New Democrat Environmental Critic Linda Duncan (Edmonton-Strathcona) says one need only consider the record of the federal government in preventing and responding to spills to understand the opposition to this project.

"I experienced firsthand the devastation of the bunker C spill at Lake Wabamun and the failure by federal departments to respond including to address impacts to First Nation lands.," said Duncan. "The concerns raised about risks posed by this project are well founded."

Posted: March 29, 2010

  Natural resources

Public Values ( is a project of the Golden Lake Institute and the online publication

Public Values
Donate to
Health care
Public services
Natural resources
Front lines
Voices of privatization
Feedback and dialogue
About Us
What is framing?
Wednesday, December 13, 2017
Updated frequently
To view photo captions, run your mouse over the photo
Bookmark and Share

© Golden Lake Institute/, 2007-11 owns copyright on all staff-written articles.
We encourage others to freely distribute material from this website but, without explicit permission,
Web publishers may only use short excerpts that also include credit to us and a reference to our site for the full article.
This site is managed by the Golden Lake InstituteVisit Golden Lake Institute Website and Straight Goods NewsVisit Straight Goods News Website
For comments or suggestions, please contact the Editor
For technical issues, please contact the Webmaster