Public Values

Food safety: Why end government grain inspection?

Study finds public safety, market confidence, grower's independence all at risk.

CCPA Senior Researcher Scott Sinclair wants grain inspectors to remain accountable to the publicby the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives

OTTAWA, March 31, 2009 — A controversial bill to change Canada's grain regulatory system threatens Canada's grain safety and quality, says a study released today by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.

According to the study, Bill C-13 ignores the lessons learned about the dangers of cutting back public inspection. It would eliminate independent government inspection of grain delivered to major elevators around the country and leave grain companies free to arrange their own inspections.

"Keeping pesticide-treated grain, glass, rodent excreta and other dangerous contaminants out of Canada's food grain system is too important a responsibility to hand to grain companies," says CCPA Senior Researcher Scott Sinclair. "The job requires trained inspectors who are independent of the grain companies they oversee and accountable to the public."

The bill would also end an established security program for farmers that guarantees they are paid for the grain they deliver, thereby increasing farmers' risk of catastrophic financial losses if a buyer cannot, or will not, pay for delivered grain.

"In this global economic downturn, and with no workable alternative in place, the government is kicking away a key pillar of financial stability for Canadian grain producers," says CCPA Research Associate Dr. Jim Grieshaber-Otto.

If these and other controversial government proposals are implemented, they would:

• reduce the reputation and competitiveness of Canadian wheat in international markets;

• decrease the price premium Canadian producers now receive for a distinctive product;

• increase the risk of food-safety problems; and

• augment the power of huge US-based multinational grain companies at the expense of Canadian producers.

"The destruction of Canada's existing grain system is avoidable," says Sinclair. "Acting together, opposition parties in Parliament can work in the public interest to safeguard and enhance this remarkable policy and regulatory success."

Links and sources
  Download the CCPA report,Threatened Harvest, by Scott Sinclair & Jim Grieshaber-Otto, published March 31 2009
  www.policyalternatives.ca

Posted: April 01, 2009

Categories:
  News
  Research
  Politics
  Campaigns
  Public services
  Natural resources
  Front lines
  Voices of privatization
  Feedback and dialogue

Public Values (PublicValues.ca) is a project of the Golden Lake Institute and the online publication StraightGoods.ca


Public Values
 
HOME
CONTACT US
SEARCH
FREE BULLETIN
FRANÇAIS
Search PublicValues.ca
Donate to PublicValues.ca
News
Research
Politics
Campaigns
Health care
Public services
Natural resources
Energy
Education
Front lines
Voices of privatization
Feedback and dialogue
Visit StraightGoods.ca
About Us
Donations
Newswire/RSS
What is framing?
Monday, October 23, 2017
Updated frequently
To view photo captions, run your mouse over the photo
 
Bookmark and Share

© Golden Lake Institute/PublicValues.ca, 2007-11
PublicValues.ca owns copyright on all staff-written articles.
We encourage others to freely distribute material from this website but, without explicit permission,
Web publishers may only use short excerpts that also include credit to us and a reference to our site for the full article.
This site is managed by the Golden Lake InstituteVisit Golden Lake Institute Website and Straight Goods NewsVisit Straight Goods News Website
For comments or suggestions, please contact the PublicValues.ca Editor
For technical issues, please contact the PublicValues.ca Webmaster