Public Values

New guide helps municipalities sort out the facts about P3s

Critical concerns raised regarding protection of public services.

Loxley: Safest approach foregoes privatization, follows conventional public sector procurement modelRegina, SK, September 10, 2012: A new guide encourages municipal officials to show caution in considering the use of public-private partnerships to finance public infrastructure projects. The conclusion of John Loxley, the guide's author and economics professor at the University of Manitoba, is clear: "Municipalities need to be wary of P3s. They are not the best option."

The reference document "Asking the Right Questions: A Guide for Municipalities Considering P3s" raises critical concerns about the protection of public services and provides essential information to assist municipalities in making sound decisions in the best interest of their citizens.

"Infrastructure projects implemented under P3s are not advantageous for municipalities or their citizens," stated national Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) president Paul Moist. "After they read this guide, mayors and city councillors tempted to rush headlong into pro-privatization initiatives will agree with us that P3s do not offer all the benefits touted by promoters of that model."

  Investing in the renewal and expansion of public assets is good both for the economy and for the residents of our cities and towns.

"Whether in terms of costs, risk sharing, service quality, infrastructure maintenance, the impact on workers, communities and the local economy, accountability or penalties for breach of contract, the detailed responses in this guide will equip municipalities to review the facts carefully before entering into a P3," explained Dr. Loxley.

"Due to the major concerns raised about P3s, the safest approach for municipalities is to forego privatization and continue to follow the conventional public sector procurement model - a model that can be reinforced by improving the planning and monitoring capacity of municipalities, strengthening staffing expertise and staffing levels, rather than cutting them back," Loxley added.

CUPE is calling for long-term stable federal financing for municipalities to fulfill their growing responsibilities for infrastructure. "Municipalities across Canada are currently facing a total shortfall of $123 billion when it comes to funding municipal infrastructure, and the Conservatives can't just walk away from this problem," asserted Moist.

According to CUPE, the federal P3 fund should also be eliminated and the monies redirected into projects upholding the public status of community assets. "Investing in the renewal and expansion of public assets is good both for the economy and for the residents of our cities and towns," Moist concluded.

Links and sources
  CUPE launches guide for municipalities outlining the risks of P3s

Posted: October 01, 2012

  Public services

Public Values ( is a project of the Golden Lake Institute and the online publication

Public Values
Donate to
Health care
Public services
Natural resources
Front lines
Voices of privatization
Feedback and dialogue
About Us
What is framing?
Wednesday, December 13, 2017
Updated frequently
To view photo captions, run your mouse over the photo
Bookmark and Share

© Golden Lake Institute/, 2007-11 owns copyright on all staff-written articles.
We encourage others to freely distribute material from this website but, without explicit permission,
Web publishers may only use short excerpts that also include credit to us and a reference to our site for the full article.
This site is managed by the Golden Lake InstituteVisit Golden Lake Institute Website and Straight Goods NewsVisit Straight Goods News Website
For comments or suggestions, please contact the Editor
For technical issues, please contact the Webmaster