Public Values

Harper's health scheme will mean 'Goin' Down the Road' for Maritimers

Regional out-migration to increase under heavy financial burdens.

Fillmore: Again, many more millions will go to already rich western provinces compared to Maritimes.by Nick Fillmore

January 18, 2012: By dramatically changing the health care funding formula, is Prime Minister Stephen Harper showing little concern for the future of the Maritime Provinces?

The Health Accord "deal" that Harper practically threw in the face of the provinces and territories this week not only cuts health funding for all the provinces starting in four years, but also threatens to widen further the growing standard-of-living chasm between the "have" and "have-not" provinces.

As their meeting ended in Victoria on Tuesday, the premiers vowed they will pressure the Conservative government to change the least equitable aspects of the so-called take-it-or-leave-it "agreement". But what if the sometimes stubborn Harper government refuses to give much ground?

  "The Harper government believes that what happens in the marketplace should decide the fate of our country."

All citizens of the Maritimes — not just the governments — would have good reason to vehemently protest the new agreement because the provinces that would likely lose the most in the long term are Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island.

Increase in cost of living

If the 2016-17 part of the agreement goes into effect, the cost of living will increase in the Maritimes, and this will be another blow to the region's problem of too many people leaving to live elsewhere in the country.

Parliamentary budget officer Kevin Page said in his evaluation of the agreement that by going to the GST-based formula, the Conservatives plan to download onto the provinces perhaps as much as $31 billion by 2024.

Future federal payments will be based largely on the growth of each province's GDP — the gross domestic product: the market value of all goods and services produced within a province during a year. The Royal Bank has predicted GDP rates for the provinces for 2012 and if by chance, these increases were to be the same in the period starting 2016-17, the four western provinces would receive health care expenditure increases roughly double those for the Maritime Provinces.

Projected GDP increases for have provinces for 2012: BC 2.3 percent; Alberta 3.9; Saskatchewan 4.2; and Manitoba 3.2.

Projected GDP increases for the Maritimes: 1.8; New Brunswick 1.8; Nova Scotia 1.6; and PEI 1.9.

The result will be that once again, many more millions of dollars will go to the already rich western provinces compared to payments to the Maritimes.

This means huge additional costs for the Maritimes and, combined with other factors, could be the straw that breaks the camel's back in terms of more people making the tough decision to move to a more affordable part of the country.

A comparison of some facts about have-not Nova Scotia and have-province British Columbia indicate why thousands of people already leave the Maritimes.

Unemployment rate: Nova Scotia: 7.8 percent (plus thousands discouraged from being listed); British Columbia: 7 percent. Conclusion: it's much harder to get a job in Nova Scotia.

Consumer Price Index: Nova Scotia food: 135.9; BC food: 126. NS shelter: 132.2; BC shelter: 114.5. Overall index: Nova Scotia: 124; BC: 117.5. It is quite a bit more expensive to live in Nova Scotia.

Average hourly wages (mostly skilled): NS: $20.57; BC: $23.51. Employees earn on average $3 more per hour in BC, but live more cheaply.

Because of these and other factors, Nova Scotia already experiences a serious exodus of people. A TD Bank report in January 2011 said that during the years 2007 to 2010, Nova Scotia's net loss of people to other provinces was 4,640. Incidentally, during the same period, 43,568 people moved from some part of Canada to British Columbia.

Unfortunately, with Nova Scotia having to shoulder additional health costs in a very few short years, it is likely that many more people will be tempted to go west, leaving the province with too small a population base to develop as it would like.

And if this were not enough, the Harper government may want to make additional changes that would further damage the financial picture for the Maritimes.

For decades, federal governments spent billions of dollars supporting economic development in poor parts of the country in an attempt to maintain some semblance of equality of opportunity and standard of living across the country.

Big change with Harper in command

But there is now a dramatic change in the attitude in Ottawa. For Stephen Harper, it all comes down to — you guessed it — right-wing ideology. Tom Flanagan, a former Harper mentor, embraces the return of "classical federalism" to Canada.

"In the Canadian context, the revival of classical federalism is an essential part of classical liberalism [that is, neoliberalism], with emphasis on smaller government, lower taxes and balanced budgets," Flanagan wrote in The Globe and Mail. "It is good news that Stephen Harper's Conservative government is now moving incrementally toward both classical federalism and classical liberalism."

The Harper government believes that what happens in the marketplace should decide the fate of our country. So, if it is "bust" in PEI when it's "boom" in Saskatchewan, people should move west. That's the law of the marketplace.

The neo-liberal ideology being implemented by the Conservatives may mean they will also want to fiddle with equalization payments: money transferred to the less prosperous provincial governments "to provide their residents with public services that are reasonably comparable to those in other provinces, at reasonably comparable levels of taxation".

Nova Scotia, one of the provinces that receives the most under the concept, will receive a transfer payment (under the Atlantic Accord) in 2011-12 of $1.268 billion — a huge amount of money for the province.

Perhaps luckily for the Maritimes, the concept of transfer payments was enshrined in the Constitution in 1982, but this will not stop the Harper government from trying to compensate for the payments in one way or another.

If Harper gets his way in bringing a near-total market-driven economy to Canada, we could very well end up with a two-tier country — one for the rich and one for the poor.

Nick Fillmore, previously an investigate journalist and producer with the CBC, is a freelance journalist and social activist based in Toronto.
Blog: http://nickfillmore.blogspot.com/
Email: fillmore0274@rogers.com

Links and sources
  Unless people take action, Harper's scheme will mean 'Goin' Down the Road' for Maritimers

Posted: January 19, 2012

Categories:
  Politics
  Health care
  Public services

Public Values (PublicValues.ca) is a project of the Golden Lake Institute and the online publication StraightGoods.ca


Public Values
 
HOME
CONTACT US
SEARCH
FREE BULLETIN
FRANÇAIS
Search PublicValues.ca
Donate to PublicValues.ca
News
Research
Politics
Campaigns
Health care
Public services
Natural resources
Energy
Education
Front lines
Voices of privatization
Feedback and dialogue
Visit StraightGoods.ca
About Us
Donations
Newswire/RSS
What is framing?
Monday, December 11, 2017
Updated frequently
To view photo captions, run your mouse over the photo
 
Bookmark and Share

© Golden Lake Institute/PublicValues.ca, 2007-11
PublicValues.ca owns copyright on all staff-written articles.
We encourage others to freely distribute material from this website but, without explicit permission,
Web publishers may only use short excerpts that also include credit to us and a reference to our site for the full article.
This site is managed by the Golden Lake InstituteVisit Golden Lake Institute Website and Straight Goods NewsVisit Straight Goods News Website
For comments or suggestions, please contact the PublicValues.ca Editor
For technical issues, please contact the PublicValues.ca Webmaster