Public Values

P3 hospital construction costs more, delivers less than proposal

Specifics of cost overruns, service cuts and cover-up in the Brampton Hospital P3.

The new P3 hospital in Brampton has failed to deliver on key promisesby Ontario Health Coalition

January 7, 2008

Summary of Key Findings

In November 2001, Tony Clement and Jim Flaherty announced the new Brampton Civic Hospital was to be built as a P3 project (along with the Royal Ottawa Hospital redevelopment) in the first deals of this sort in Canada. The hospital was to house 608 beds and cost $350 million with a construction deadline of 2005.

The justification for the P3 privatization policy by both the Harris/Eves and McGuinty governments was that the hospital would be built on time and in budget. But by the end of the negotiations with the private sector consortium the capital costs alone had risen to $650 million and the number of beds had decreased to 479 and the construction deadline was delayed by two years.


Costs have nearly doubled since the proposal, hospital beds have decreased by one-third.

In the Brampton hospital, the private sector manages and runs services amounting to about 50 percent of a normal hospital budget for 25 years. They also have significant control over the lands and commercial development inside the hospital. This is unprecedented.

The costs and consequences of the P3 privatization can now be evaluated through the public record and newly released internal government and hospital documents disclosed after a court order in 2007. They include:

  1. Significant cost increases of 186 percent from the outset of negotiations with the P3 consortium to the most recent public revelations in March 2007.

  2. Changes to the hospital plans from a three-building facility housing 20 Operating Rooms to a two-building facility housing 12 Operating Rooms.

  3. Significant bed reductions of 22 percent in the new facility alone, and 34 percent across both Brampton hospital sites. These bed reductions happened after the cost increases in the P3 negotiations.

  4. More than 2 years delay in the construction deadlines.

  5. An increase in the local community fundraising burden of more than 200 percent as the costs escalated in the P3 negotiations.

From the records, the actual figures are as follows:

Cost Increases: Cost estimate at outset of negotiations with P3 consortium: $350 million Most recent "final cost": $650 million disclosed in 2007. Government claim: the hospital was "on budget".

Bed Reductions: Promised at outset of negotiations with P3 consortium: 720 beds for the community by 2008, including 608 at the new hospital and 112 at a planned redevelopment of the old hospital

January 2008 total number of beds: 479 beds at the new hospital, plans to redevelop the old hospital as a hospital are cancelled. (Community consultations on what should be done with the site are beginning in January 2008.)

The plans for the new hospital were altered to cut one of the three planned clinical care buildings.

Most recent assessment of community need for hospital beds: 930 beds required by 2008 (District Health Council Regional Hospital Infrastructure Plan


Project Delays: Original completion deadline: 2005. Actual completion of the project: October 2007. Government claim: the hospital was completed "on time".

Cover Up: For more than half a decade the hospital and the province denied the obvious privatization and attempted to keep secret the details of the hospital deal and their internal documents relating to it.

At every stage, as deadlines were missed, as costs ballooned, as the capacity of the hospital was reduced, elected officials responded to public questioning with a string of broken promises, denials and obfuscation.

In fact, as the newly released internal government and hospital documents reveal:

  • The final Brampton P3 project agreement was clearly negotiated by both the Harris/Eves and McGuinty governments. They reveal that while the McGuinty government amended the original project agreement, it did not "cancel" nor reverse the P3 deal as it claimed.

  • The negotiated amendments neither provided public transparency nor public control as claimed by the minister and the premier. They reveal the extent of the documentation that remained hidden until a court order forced its release in the spring of 2007.

  • The project deadlines became "moving targets" as costs escalated and the size shrank.

Two successive governments have allowed PR spin to trump honest reporting on the consequences of the P3 decision. The provincial auditor has never audited the Brampton and Ottawa deals, despite the controversy and repeated promises by the government that the P3 deals would be audited.

Two Ministers of Health, two Premiers and three hospital CEOs have deliberately misled the public about the consequences of their choice to embrace P3 privatization of the Brampton hospital. These decision-makers, have misled the public about:

  • the model used in the hospital financing and redevelopment;

  • the increasing costs of the hospital and the consequent reductions in planned capacity;

  • the progress of the construction;

  • the amendments to the P3 deal;

  • the unprecedented extent of privatization;

  • the cancellation of the planned redevelopment for the Peel Memorial hospital site.

The model for P3 privatization used in Brampton is as follows:

In the Brampton hospital P3, (Public Private Partnership) the private sector formed a group of companies called a "consortium" including architects, financiers, service privatizers, and property management firms to finance, build and operate the new hospital.

The consortium makes profit from the deal in at least five ways:

  1. The costs for building the hospital are paid back through a lease-to- own deal which commits Ontarians to 25 years of payments to cover the building costs and provide a significant profit margin for the financiers, construction company and consultants involved.

  2. All the support services from patient records to food are given to the consortium to run for their own profit for the 25-year contract, bundled into the real estate deal.

  3. The consortium is allowed to develop the lands, and "ancillary business opportunities" including technology deals and vendor contracts for private clinics or businesses inside and outside the hospital to provide additional streams of revenue from which they take profit, also bundled into the real estate deal.

  4. User-fees such as parking fees are given as an additional stream of profit for the private consortium for the duration of the deal.

  5. The consortium is entitled to take 50 percent from the windfall of refinancing or selling off its interest in the hospital.

The Ontario Health Coalition is calling for:

  1. A review of the P3 policy and a moratorium on all hospital P3s.

  2. An audit by the Provincial Auditor General of the P3 deals signed to date, including Brampton's.

  3. The redevelopment of the Peel Memorial hospital to bring the total beds up to the promised 720 at minimum, with a needs assessment and a plan to bring the total hospital beds up to assessed community need as soon as possible.

  4. Provincial funding support and human resources recruitment support to alleviate the financial pressures and staffing shortages in the new hospital.

  5. Complete disclosure on the Royal Ottawa Hospital P3 deal, and the additional P3 deals that have been signed to date.

The full report is available at the web site linked below.

The Ontario Health Coalition is a network of over 400 grassroots community organizations representing virtually all areas of Ontario. Their primary goal is to empower the members of their constituent organizations to become actively engaged in the making of public policy on matters related to health care and healthy communities.

Links and sources
  Ontario Health Coalition

Posted: March 06, 2008

  Health care
  Front lines
  Voices of privatization

Public Values ( is a project of the Golden Lake Institute and the online publication

Public Values
Donate to
Health care
Public services
Natural resources
Front lines
Voices of privatization
Feedback and dialogue
About Us
What is framing?
Tuesday, December 12, 2017
Updated frequently
To view photo captions, run your mouse over the photo
Bookmark and Share

© Golden Lake Institute/, 2007-11 owns copyright on all staff-written articles.
We encourage others to freely distribute material from this website but, without explicit permission,
Web publishers may only use short excerpts that also include credit to us and a reference to our site for the full article.
This site is managed by the Golden Lake InstituteVisit Golden Lake Institute Website and Straight Goods NewsVisit Straight Goods News Website
For comments or suggestions, please contact the Editor
For technical issues, please contact the Webmaster